Abstract
Menopause is a natural process in a woman's life, which tends to worsen by presenting a series of symptoms and signs such as Genitourinary Menopause Syndrome (GMS). Nowadays, local and systemic hormonal therapy has been shown to be the most effective treatments for these cases, however, non-hormonal treatments such as fractional CO2 Laser and Platelet Rich Plasma have emerged as alternatives. The objective of this clinical trial was to compare the effectiveness of fractional CO2 Laser vs. Platelet Rich Plasma in the treatment of GMS. Before applying the protocol and 30 days after the third treatment session, the following samples were taken: vaginal pH, vaginal cytology and biopsy, vaginal health index, and female sexual satisfaction index. Patients treated with fractional CO2 Laser improved dryness, urinary urgency and decreased sexual desire by 100%, compared to those treated with PRP (90%). Vaginal pH reached normal levels (pH 5) with both treatments. Cytology showed an improvement in the patients treated with fractional CO2 Laser, the quantity of superficial and intermediate cells by 80%, unlike PRP with 60%. Although optical microscopy was used, non- keratinized stratified squamous epithelium was observed in 10% (pretreatment) improved to 50% in patients treated with fractionated CO2 Laser, unlike PRP in 20%. The vaginal health index improved above 15 with both treatments, however, when the FSFI was applied, there was a significant difference of 24.89 versus 14.76, in favor of the CO2 Laser. In summary, the fractional CO2 Laser and Platelet Rich Plasma recommended as an alternative therapy for GMS because it is effective and safe
References
Departamento de asuntos económicos y sociales de las Naciones Unidas, World propsects 2021. Disponible en: https://popularition.un.org/wpp/downloadstandard/p opulation
Rey C. La menopausia: una etapa de grandes cambios. Sociedad de Obstetricia y Ginecología de Buenos Aires.
Portman DJ, Gass MLS. Vulvovaginal atrophy terminology consensus conference panel. Genitourinary syndrome of menopause. New terminology for vulvovaginal atrophy from the International Society for the Studyof Women’s Sexual Healthant the Nort American Menopause Society; 2014; 21:1063-8.
Palacios S, Cancelo MJ, González S, Manubens M, Sánchez R. Revista Progresos de obstetricia y ginecología. Síndrome genitourinario de la menopausia. Recomendación de la Sociedad Española de Ginecología y Obstetricia; 2019; 62 (2): 141-8.
Palma F, Xholli A, Cagnacci A. As the writing group of agata study the most bothersome symptom of vaginal atrophy: Evidence from the observational agata study. Maturitas; 2018; 18-23.
Palacios S, Nappi RE, Bryniks N, Partico M, Panay N. Eves study investigators. The European vulvovaginal epidemiological survey (EVES). Prevalence, syntoms and impact of vulvovaginal atrophy of menopause. Climateric; 2018; 286-95.
Espitia F. Prevalence of genito urinary syndrome of menopause and impact on sexuality of women in Quindío (Colombia). Rev. Columb Obstetric Ginecol; 2013-2016; 69(4):249-5. Disponible en: httos://dol.orglio.18597//rcog.3111
Kim HK, Kong SY, Chung VJ, Kin JH, Kim MR. The recent review of te genitourinary sindrome of menopause. J. Menopausal. Med; 2015; 21(2):65-71. Disponible en: https://dol.org/10.6118/jmm.2015.21.2.65.
Baquedano L, Sánchez S, AznarT, Cancelo MJ, Escribano JJ, González S, Iglesias E, Jaime J, Manubens N, Sánchez-Borrego R, Palacios S. Síndrome genitourinario de la menopausia. Memogruia AEE. Primera edición; 2020.
Donay N, Fenton A. Vulvovaginal atrophy-a tale of neglect. Climacteric; 2014; 17:1-2.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Iberoaméricana de Láser Médico
